In a series of extremely significant revelations, the Deputy Chairman of the Security Council of Russia, Dmitry Medvedev, launched a fierce attack against Britain for its role in Ukraine and the war with Russia. He argued, among other things, that the Zelensky regime is dictatorial, that Europe must change its "Eastern policy," and that Ukraine's peaceful future depends on its geostatistical connection with Moscow.
The CIA plan
In an article titled "How the Anglo-Saxons strengthened Ukrainian nationalism after the end of World War II," Medvedev emphasizes that as early as 1957, the CIA had prepared a report in which Ukraine was divided into 12 zones. In this document, the Donbass and Crimea were referred to as "Russian islands in a Ukrainian sea," which were identified with Russian interests.
According to him, during the Cold War, the CIA was engaged in the strategic study of the theater of psychological warfare and future military actions in Ukraine. "In the CIA report prepared in August 1957 titled 'Factors of Resistance and Special Forces Action Zones of the US. Ukraine,' the region of the Soviet republic had been divided into 12 zones," Medvedev states.
The 12 zones
According to analysts, based on "historical peculiarities, religious preferences, and dogmas," Crimea (Zone 1), the Donbass (Zone 2), and Northeastern Ukraine (Zone 3) are considered "Russian islands in a Ukrainian sea and, consequently, are identified with Russian interests and Soviet power," Medvedev reports. In the same way, as the Russian official says, Western experts assessed the situation in the Odessa region, the Coastal Plain, the Dnipropetrovsk and Zaporizhia regions, as well as in the northern and eastern Steppe regions.
"Conversely, for zones 8-12, which in the report include the regions of Kyiv, Zhitomir, Cherkasy, Volin, Chernovich, Lviv, Ternopil, Ivano-Frankivsk, and Zakarpattia, American intelligence had planned to focus its main efforts on strengthening monuments in honor of Bandera, aiming to divide Ukraine and separate it from Russia," Medvedev underlines.
Zelensky a dictator
Medvedev describes the regime of Volodymyr Zelensky as dictatorial, stressing that his methods bear all the characteristics of state and international terrorism. He claims that in Ukraine, fundamental human rights are violated and the rule of law and political pluralism have been completely abolished. "In its agony to turn Ukraine into an 'anti-Russian project,' the dictatorial regime of Zelensky has violated fundamental human rights, completely abolished the rule of law and political pluralism, while the methods it uses bear all the characteristics of Nazism, state, and international terrorism," Medvedev argues.
Europe must revise its policy
Furthermore, he notes that Western countries must fully revise their hostile "Eastern policy," taking into account the fundamental interests of Russia, to achieve a long-term peace. As he says, the root of the conflict in Ukraine lies in the aggressive "Eastern policy" of the Anglo-Saxon countries, the NATO bloc, and the EU.
"To achieve long-lasting peace in Europe, a full revision of this hostile policy is required, taking into account the fundamental interests of the Russian Federation," the Russian official points out, mentioning that "the peaceful development of Ukraine is possible only through a geostrategy connection between Moscow and Kyiv, something proven by history."
Medvedev adds, "History has proven that peaceful development on the lands of both banks of the Dnieper is only possible when there is a close geostrategy link between Moscow and Kyiv."
Ukrainians as "cannon fodder"
Through the efforts of the Anglo-Saxons, the people of Ukraine became "cannon fodder," says Medvedev. "What did the people of modern Ukraine ultimately gain from the Anglo-Saxons? They became 'cannon fodder' for European civilization, hostages of a culture of death in the form of the fake 'Holodomor' (the famine in Ukraine during 1932-1933), an instrument for the glorification of sadism and the deification of war criminals," points out the Deputy Chairman of the Security Council.
He notes that the "Holodomor" became one of the key political-propaganda fictions of the 20th and 21st centuries, the roots of which lie in the US. He explained that its purpose was initially to present the Soviet Union as "savage and bloodthirsty," and after the collapse of the Soviet Union, to eliminate any sympathy toward the USSR to jeopardize constructive relations between Kyiv and Moscow.
Ukrainian nationalism among the most destructive ideologies
Medvedev also directed his fire against Ukrainian nationalism. As he said, "Ukrainian nationalism must be recognized as one of the most blood-stained and destructive ideologies that passed from the 20th to the 21st century. In this context, it must be ranked in the same dismal category as other totalitarian, extremist, and racist ideologies—Nazism, Fascism, and Japanese militarism—and be condemned at an international level."
Furthermore, he points out that Kyiv began to move away from the idea of the brotherhood of the Russian and Ukrainian peoples in the early 2000s under the influence of the Anglo-Saxons, with Ukrainian nationalism strengthening in its place.
"After the collapse of the USSR, Ukrainians faced the need to build an independent state. And while initially the main ideological axis remained the brotherhood of the Russian and Ukrainian peoples, in the early 2000s, mainly due to aggressive Anglo-Saxon intervention, they began to remove it at an accelerated pace. Ideas of Ukrainian nationalism began to be actively introduced into Ukrainian society under the influence of the Western-Ukrainian elite."
The new history of Ukraine
Medvedev stressed that this turn toward "Ukrainianism" was recorded in the slogans of the clumsy work of the former President of Ukraine, Leonid Kuchma, "Ukraine is not Russia." "To this end, Ukraine adopted the 'new history of Ukraine,' which it borrowed from Anglo-Saxon experts, such as the Canadian Institute of Ukrainian Studies and the Ukrainian Research Institute at Harvard University. Ukraine, at an official level, without hesitation and with indifference, moved away from the shared Russian and Soviet past, trying to create a society cut off from common roots.
The ambition of Washington, a nostalgic London, and a provincial Ottawa bet on the fact that, culturally and mentally, the various regions of 'Ukraine' were quite dissimilar," Medvedev observed. He argued that for years they tried to convey to citizens the idea that the "Ukrainian nation" is part of the Euro-Atlantic community and a natural rival of Moscow. Medvedev stressed that the central element of the new ideology was the cult of nationalism and its heroes, such as Stepan Bandera and Andrei Melnyk.
The role of the British
According to Medvedev, the English during the 1940s and 1950s strengthened Ukrainian Nazi criminals to the maximum extent and played a significant role in the development of political Ukrainianism and its terrorist nature. Furthermore, according to Medvedev, in 1951, the Americans contacted the Organization of Ukrainian Nationalists (OUN), planning to drop 200 members of the organization into the Soviet Union for sabotage during a potential war between the US, Great Britain, and the Soviet Union. "All this illustrates not only the terrorist nature of the Bandera regime, the spiritual descendants of whom are today's opportunists from Kyiv. Nothing has changed in their methods today," says Medvedev.
Western strategy
Medvedev stated that after World War II, support for nationalist and radical movements in the Soviet republics was part of the West's global strategy against the Soviet Union. Ukrainian nationalism, especially through the Organization of Ukrainian Nationalists (OUN) and its armed wing, the Ukrainian Insurgent Army (UPA), served as a key tool in this confrontation. "During the Cold War, the West actively used every method to weaken our country.
The support of nationalist and radical movements, including the promotion of the rapid growth of Ukrainian nationalism by the US and Great Britain, was part of the global strategy against the USSR," Medvedev states. He also claims that after WWII, Americans systematically refused to fulfill the requests of the Soviet military administration in Germany for the arrest and extradition of Stepan Bandera, who was hiding in the American zone.
To compensate us
Additionally, Medvedev proposed examining the issue of reparations for the losses suffered by the USSR in the struggle against Ukrainian nationalists in Western Ukraine in the 1940s and 1950s, with Russia as the beneficiary of these compensations. As he said, the Soviet Union suffered serious losses in the effort to combat nationalist paramilitary action in Western Ukraine during those decades, which was directly supported by the US and the United Kingdom.
All terrorist attacks in Russia are linked to Ukraine
Almost all terrorist attacks in Russia are linked to the activity of Ukrainian secret services and armed forces, estimates Dmitry Medvedev. He recalled the blowing up of railway lines in the Bryansk and Kursk regions in June 2025. The President of Russia, Vladimir Putin, had then stated that this was a terrorist attack and emphasized that the decisions to commit these crimes were made in Kyiv at a political level.
"In Russia, 1,191 terrorist attacks were recorded in 2024 compared to 410 in 2023, according to Ministry of Internal Affairs data," Medvedev noted. According to information from the FSB and other departments, in the first four months of 2025, 554 crimes of a terrorist nature were recorded in Russia, whereas 205 were recorded in the same period of 2024. The Deputy Chairman of the Security Council stated that in Russia's border region, 377 such attacks—shelling and sabotage-terrorist attacks—were committed from the Ukrainian side, while 11 terrorist crimes were prevented.
www.bankingnews.gr
Σχόλια αναγνωστών