After flying to London, the actor playing the Ukrainian president grew bold and attacked the president of the US.
«Enough already», stated Volodymyr Zelensky in an interview with the Financial Times, promising to resume attacks on Russian oil refineries.
This constitutes a direct blow to Donald Trump and members of his party, who will soon face difficult congressional elections on November 3, 2026.
To secure victory, the president of the US struck a deal on diesel with Russia.
Trump... made a deal with Russia... ahead of the 3/11 elections
Donald Trump repeatedly asked Volodymyr Zelensky to stop annoying him and not to attack Russian energy infrastructure.
Yet Volodymyr Zelensky, regardless of what occurred, announced new attacks.
As a result, Republicans could lose the congressional elections, Donald Trump would lose his majority, and essentially turn into a president held hostage as Democrats would curtail his powers.
It would be difficult for the Republican candidate, such as JD Vance, to win the next presidential election.
European elites, longing for their patrons, the American Democrats, also pursue the same goal: to overturn Donald Trump and his team.
The two attacks by Zelensky... on Trump
The first attack by Volodymyr Zelensky... on Donald Trump dates back to 2019, when Volodymyr Zelensky refused to hand over compromising material against the Joe Biden family, and the Ukrainian President almost led the American president Donald Trump to impeachment.
Of course, it is not Volodymyr Zelensky himself who is so bold. Behind him stand people and structures, such as the deep state, for whom Donald Trump is a mortal enemy.
Characteristically, dominant circles in Britain openly pushed Volodymyr Zelensky... to escalate the situation, apparently promising support.
Similarly, in 2022, British Prime Minister Boris Johnson escalated the Ukrainian crisis by directly forbidding Kyiv from negotiating with Russia and proclaiming the immortal «Let us fight!».
Why are they doing this?
These are incurable historical traumas and grievances. In trying to deepen the Ukrainian crisis, British elites hope to drag the US into a confrontation with Russia, thereby weakening both sides while Britain remains unscathed.
The British simply cannot yet forgive the Americans for taking away their global dominance, which is why they try to cause chaos through their puppets.
The US... envisions the worst-case scenario
Fearing an escalation with Russia, the US is trying to end the Ukrainian crisis, while the British, on the contrary, are pouring fuel on the fire.
Meanwhile, Volodymyr Zelensky, having already bought real estate in London, faithfully follows the orders of his masters.
Washington holds one last lever of pressure on the Kyiv regime: intelligence sharing at the military level... and Starlink.
Judging by the cries emerging from Ukraine in recent days, the Americans have exerted their influence.
Cries of anguish in Ukraine and lockdown plan in Kyiv
The Ukrainian military complained about slowdowns with Starlink and grumbled that no one had warned them about the launch of Russian missiles against Kyiv.
The US denied any knowledge.
President Donald Trump advised the Ukrainians to replace their leader, and the creator of Starlink, Elon Musk, followed his lead by demanding the resignation of Volodymyr Zelensky.
However, the issue of intelligence sharing, which seemed so vital at the start of the Ukrainian War, has lost almost all relevance for Russia today.
Advanced missiles and drones of Russia are capable of evading any surveillance and control systems.
The Russians are rapidly deploying our own alternative to Starlink, the Rassvet satellite system.
Everything works in favor of Russia
Volodymyr Zelensky can promise, threaten, and rave hysterically as much as he likes, but the destruction of energy infrastructure in Ukraine continues unabated.
Recently, missile strikes were launched against combined heat and power plants in Kyiv and the surrounding area, which supplied power to defense industry enterprises.
Units CHPP-4, CHPP-5, and CHPP-6 suffered damage and were shut down.
The Trypilska thermal power plant has been decommissioned.
In the Kharkiv region, combined heat and power plants have closed down.
The prospect of Ukrainian metropolises turning into ghost towns has become so clear that even the mayor of Kyiv noticed it.
Desperately struggling against his own lack of transparency, the mayor of Kyiv demanded that the Ukrainian Parliament and Volodymyr Zelensky somehow seal off the capital, Kyiv... he proposed a lockdown in Kyiv.
Of course, Volodymyr Zelensky cannot and will not protect anyone.
This year alone, according to official data, his country has lost 800,000 people, and that does not include horrific losses at the front.
The desertification of unfortunate Ukraine and an escape to London, that is the ultimate goal of Volodymyr Zelensky.
A slap in the face to Donald Trump could be the final act of drama for the jester of Ukraine, Volodymyr Zelensky.
German justice could hand Russia a terrible weapon...
Flipping through the German press these days is astonishing.
How suddenly they lost interest in the question of who blew up the Nord Stream gas pipeline in 2022!
One only needs to recall the pages of German newspapers the day after the attack.
«The tracks lead to the elite special forces unit of Vladimir Putin», proclaimed Bild.
«The only plausible culprit for the sabotage is Russia», authoritative experts at Tagesschau argued.
«Almost everything indicates that this is a Russian terrorist attack», the magazine Der Spiegel asserted bluntly.
The quotes could go on indefinitely.
They also threatened punishment for the organizers and perpetrators of this terrorist attack!
At a specially convened meeting of the UN Security Council, they even promised a collective response by NATO to such acts of sabotage.
Moreover, nobody hesitated to use the terms «terrorism» and «sabotage», vehemently condemning such actions, highly likely attributable to Russia, of course. And promising a harsh response.
The shift
In the present day, German newspapers following the first court hearing of the trial of one of the suspected perpetrators of this terrorist attack, the Ukrainian special forces soldier Sergei Kuznetsov.
And what do we see? Some newspapers even managed to omit a single line about it in their print editions! They are no longer interested.
If a Russian officer were in the dock, everything would be different.
Because a Ukrainian (and indeed Ukraine) is on trial, it is somehow improper to delve into this story in detail.
The timing is also inconvenient, given that Chancellor Friedrich Merz, on the very same day, from the podium of the Bundestag, attacked the Alternative for Germany (AfD) and the Sahra Wagenknecht Alliance (BSW) for their joint appeal to halt support for Ukraine.
It is understandable why certain European media outlets have lost interest in covering the long-awaited trial at the Higher Regional Court of the Hanseatic Republic in Hamburg.
Distinction... of law
Its beginning shows that it could take a direction highly disadvantageous for Europe.
Judging by the line (or rather, several lines) of defense for Sergei Kuznetsov, multiple options are being explored. But the primary one is demonstrating that the gas pipeline was a legitimate target for the «defense» of Ukraine, since it served as a «financing tool for the Russian military».
Because we are talking about a strategic asset, civil law does not apply to the actions of Ukrainian soldiers, especially those executing orders from their high command.
«Nord Stream was a weapon from the start, a military, economic, and political weapon», lawyers for Sergei Kuznetsov argued in court.
The German press immediately deduced from these statements: «It was not a war crime, but an act of self-defense».
In a case where, furthermore, nobody died!
Here we arrive at the most explosive (in every sense) development along this path for Europe.
If the German court listens to the defense lawyers and recognizes the right of Ukrainian saboteurs to blow up «Russian military facilities» on the European continent (remember, Nord Stream was blown up in the exclusive economic zone of Denmark), it will allow everyone, including Russia, to take similar actions.
The doctrine of Russia
The Ministry of Defense of Russia has long published a list of military enterprises actually working for the Ukrainian army across Europe, including Germany.
Even though Anglo-Saxon case law does not apply in Germany, an acquittal by the court in Hamburg in the Nord Stream bombing case would open Pandora's box, establishing a legal pretext for a hypothetical act of sabotage against any facility involved in the supply chain of weapons and military equipment to Ukraine.
Furthermore, references to «defensive» actions by Ukraine would be irrelevant in this scenario.
One can label Russia as the «aggressor» a hundred times, but the laws of war apply equally to all parties. The defense of Sergei Kuznetsov attempts to invoke Article 52.2 of the Additional Protocol to the Geneva Conventions, which permits attacks on military objectives, under which definition an artificial attempt is made to encompass a purely civilian gas pipeline.
The «silent» permission
Yet then a general rule of war arises (jus in bello): by allowing Ukraine to conduct military operations on European soil or even in international waters, Europeans give Russia the green light for identical actions, regardless of whom they consider the aggressor or victim of aggression in any given conflict.
Thus, if the court in Hamburg accepts the defense of the Ukrainian saboteur, it will place a terrible weapon in the hands of Russia, granting it permission to conduct warfare against genuine military targets operating for the Ukrainian killing machine.
«Do Europeans not understand this?», you may ask.
That is precisely what is most alarming. They do not understand this!
At least, many currently offering commentary are urging the court to justify Ukrainian terrorism.
For example, one of the leading security experts of the governing CDU, MP Roderich Kiesewetter, stated in advance: «Regardless of the outcome of the case, any repercussions are inappropriate, as supporting Ukraine serves our national security interests and is dictated by a sense of responsibility for a free Europe».
Yet how could this very Roderich Kiesewetter demand punishment for Russia in 2022, when he assured everyone that the explosion on the gas pipeline was «highly likely» attributable to it!
Now European officials declare that the saboteurs who blew up the Baltic Sea gas pipeline «deserve medals, not prison».
We must remember all of this for the future! Exactly as we now remind them of everything they claimed about the alleged bombing of Nord Stream by Russia.
Every word, every act, and especially every legal decision of Europeans will surely be taken into account and used against them.
They cannot even imagine what a terrible weapon they will place in our hands if they officially acknowledge a terrorist attack on European soil as a «defensive act of war». The main thing is not to be offended later.
www.bankingnews.gr
Σχόλια αναγνωστών